It would depend on your idea of "accuracy". Considering that we're dealing with wholly different universes—rather than view these things as inaccurate recounts, it'd make more sense to see them as stories about entirely different beings.
As names hold power, it's not too unusual to consider that they might be shared across worlds.
As names hold power, it's not too unusual to consider that they might be shared across worlds.
At least in the mythology which shares names familiar to me—many of the gods' names are assigned to the same element, give or take some exceptions. We have little else in common, otherwise.
[and one text states the idea of "chandra" of being brahma's avatar which is a horrifying thought to this chandra, personally. no thanks.]
If anything, compared to these texts and what Zagreus has said of gods in his world, there are more differences than similarities.
[and one text states the idea of "chandra" of being brahma's avatar which is a horrifying thought to this chandra, personally. no thanks.]
If anything, compared to these texts and what Zagreus has said of gods in his world, there are more differences than similarities.
As I said, their usage of magic is strictly defined by their attributes, given that magic is calling upon the gods' power. To cast spells associated with light, for instance, would require a surya attribute.
There are complications that can arise, as well. Attributes are rendered nil if the god in question is no longer active in the universe, and human infants born with triple nil attributes are frequently stillborn.
There are complications that can arise, as well. Attributes are rendered nil if the god in question is no longer active in the universe, and human infants born with triple nil attributes are frequently stillborn.


Page 1 of 10